Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it should be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is argued that economic growth is the only solution to eradicate hunger and alleviate poverty. Others, however, are concerned that the development of the economy will create negative effects on the environment. This essay will discuss both points of view and outline my perspective.
On the one hand, it is true that economic increase has taken a heavy toll on the habitat. Firstly, the ever-increasing number of industries has led to a rise in emissions into the surroundings and this is one of the major reason which has significantly grown the volume of the greenhouse gases, which are considered to be the main culprit behind global warming. Secondly, human activities, such as clearing forests for farming and overfishing, are directly responsible for the loss of natural habitat for many wild plants and animal, and ecological imbalance. For example, whaling began to boost rapidly in the mid-19th century, the world saw record whaling levels in 1927, 1929 and 1937 respectively about 13,7 thousand, 40,2 thousand and 46 thousand fishes. These hunt activities have push eight species of whales were listed as endangered species in 1970.
On the other hand, there is no doubt that economic improvement is a useful way of solving problems such as famine and poverty. Governments focus on developing their economy means that they will generate thousands of job opportunities for residents, especially those in lower classes, which would help to enhance people's living standard and put an end to starvation. In addition, this will reduce the burden on governments' budgets and they can use these findings to invest in public services such as medical care and educational system. In other words, poor people can easily access medical service and children living in families without financial conditions can go to school.
In conclusion, I believe economic enhancement can repel hunger and poverty, however, governments should also evaluate negative impacts this development on the environment.
- The charts below show the percentage of electricity consumed by di erent sectors in Eastern Australia in 2007 and 2010 72
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 89
- The chart gives information about the percentage of overweight men and women in Australia from 1980 to 2010 100
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaur dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 82
- People in many countries are spending less time with their family What are the reasons and effects of this 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nancial conditions can go to school. In conclusion, I believe economic enhancem...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in other words, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32807570978 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85357691557 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627760252366 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.899573541 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.923076923 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3846153846 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4615384615 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131629112978 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050947249296 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612327467092 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895586086537 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517824557623 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.