Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this 21st century, railway and road transport, both are the major source of income for many countries of the world. Governments ought to be spend more money on railways rather than spending upon roads. I partially agree with this statement.
On the one hand, there are three types of transportation systems : Airplane, railways and road transportation. Mostly, airways are utilized by the businessmen or travel to other nation. But common people are used to with railways and roads so, it is sine-qua-non for authors to use wealth upon both. The price of railway ticket is too low vis-à-vis other transportation systems. Owing to affordable price and frequent routs, individuals prefer to travel through it and to reach their destination. For an instance, if people are working in a company -- which is situated 50 or 60 kilometers far from their own place. For going work, If they use personal vehicle, it might be expensive compared to railway.
On the other hand, most of the mankind have their own vehicle : bike; car. Because its dream of humans, having their personal vehicle. They are using for personal use ; at the time of emergency. In the world, many of the people have full filled their needs by driving. It helps the government to increase economy of the nation. For an example, when people buy any vehicle, at that time they pay some types of taxes : G.S.T, Insurance, R.T.O tax and many more. Not only these kind of taxes but also toll tax - while driving upon service road. All the taxes are collected by the authors.
To sum up, it is better to spend money on both railways and roads, are affordable for citizens and beneficial for governments because both raise the national income.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-30 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Huyenlbg87 | 11 | view |
- cutting down tree is real environment threat yes this is still happening at a great rate around the world why do you think forests are being destroyed are there benefits from the destruction of forest 84
- People in this 21st century enjoying better life quality compared people who lived in the previous centuries Advantage aand disadvantage 61
- The bar chart below gives information about scoence qualifications held by people in two countries
- Some people think that education should help students to be useful to the whole society while other people think that education should provide students with opportunities to archieve personal ambitious Discuss both views and give your 56
- The Pie Charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 447, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd frequent routs, individuals prefer to travel through it and to reach their des...
^^
Line 9, column 422, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: T
...time they pay some types of taxes : G.S.T, Insurance, R.T.O tax and many more. No...
^
Line 9, column 440, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: O
... types of taxes : G.S.T, Insurance, R.T.O tax and many more. Not only these kind ...
^
Line 9, column 470, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ance, R.T.O tax and many more. Not only these kind of taxes but also toll tax - while driv...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, kind of, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93103448276 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61847644995 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596551724138 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9888311534 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.2631578947 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2631578947 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.31578947368 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163525525102 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505388765288 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792396030887 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130541091332 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0995050717004 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.72 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.