Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Governments provide many services to their citizens, namely education, healthcare, and entertainment. However, some people believe that the authorities should prioritize spending in useful sectors only, which do not include the arts. I thoroughly disagree with this since the arts can greatly benefit both individuals and society as a whole.
A main argument for investing in the arts is that it can save the government money in other areas, especially healthcare. This is because art is one of the best means people have to express themselves and vent their emotions, which helps in relieving a lot of the stress of modern life. In fact, art therapy is becoming increasingly popular in many countries as a form of psychological treatment for depression and anxiety. In the long term, this can save governments the expense of treating these types of patients at hospitals. In addition, art allows activists to draw attention to local or global matters that concern them by painting, performing plays, or singing in order to raise public awareness; governments can utilize the same approach to promote health-related issues.
In addition to reducing healthcare costs, art can preserve cultures and support social security. Most of the traditions we practice nowadays have been passed down from generation to generation through some forms of art, such as poems and rituals. To illustrate, some marriage ceremonies in modern Egyptian society follow the same customs as those of the Pharaohs’ era as depicted on ancient monuments. Moreover, art provides employment to thousands in museums, galleries, and other venues, thereby supporting the tourism industry and boosting the economy. Thus, not only can a government help the nation’s economy through art, but it can also maintain the culture that creates national pride and attracts visitors.
In conclusion, government spending on the arts is clearly not a waste of budget resources; on the contrary, investing in the arts significantly benefits societies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | hanhkatori2402 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-30 | thuhuyen29042006 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-29 | Huonglando1710 | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | Lunar Tran | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | Sanaullah97 | 73 | view |
- Government investment in the arts such as music and theatre is a waste of money Governments must invest this money in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 89
- Some universities are offering online courses as an alternative to classes delivered in campus Is this a positive or negative development 78
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 61
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Many young people now know more about international pop and movie stars than famous people in the history of their countries What are the causes Give solutions to increase the number of people to know about famous people in history 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 530, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...g these types of patients at hospitals. In addition, art allows activists to draw ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...oach to promote health-related issues. In addition to reducing healthcare costs, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, thus, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4076433121 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9693759269 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627388535032 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0477680431 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.285714286 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236979076205 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754203718307 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611088038308 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147490268739 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053434453341 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.