The chart shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008.
The given bar-chart compares the proportional trend of fruit and vegetable intake per day based on a survey done on men, women, and children in the UK over a period of 8 years from 2001 to 2008.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that women led the list, while after facing a stagnant period between the first few years, the consumption rate of men and children rose significantly at the same pace by the end of the period.
According to the given illustration, in 2001, more than 20% of women were consuming the right portion. Thereafter, with the passing time, the rate kept on rising dramatically until it doubled to acquire peak value in 2006. However, with a marginal decline of 10%, the rate experienced a drop to touch 30% during the last two years.
On the other hand, portraying a similar pattern, men and children possessed a constant value to level off at 18% and 12% respectively between 2001 and 2003. Over time, a surge in the intake pushed the value higher by 10% in each case, which remained stable between 2006 and 2007. But, a slight dip slipped the value down by 3% in 2008(28% down to 25%). Although men and children paced up to increase healthy eating, women topped the overall pattern.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-30 | MichaelP | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | cutecutecue | view | |
| 2021-08-15 | nami | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-28 | prathamp114 | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-08 | rojababa | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows the water cycle which is the continuous movement of water on above and below the surface of the Earth 78
- The chart below shows the numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles traveled PMT by transportation type in 2002 78
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 84
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The column graph shows the rate of consumers in three age groups taking healthy food between 2011 and 2016 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g, women topped the overall pattern.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75229357798 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5468921006 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623853211009 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8186254418 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.111111111 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128089701786 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483313600131 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933737216404 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0953501318234 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120259576885 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.