In some countries, younger people are neglecting their rights to vote. What problems does this cause and what are some of the possible solutions?
Many youngsters in different nations are deciding not to vote during the elections. The result of this leads to a selection of those candidates favored by middle-aged and older adults, so in order to motivate the younger population to vote, the voting booths should be placed at places were youngsters go more frequently.
As leaders ruling the democratic countries are chosen by people who vote, policies benefiting older people are enabled when the younger population does not vote. The issues related to the middle-aged and older population, like changes in the tax system, pension schemes and building old- age homes, become priorities for the government. The policies related to the younger population are not given importance, because members representing the young adults fail to get elected. For example, after the 2017 election in which only 5% of under 25s voted, the state government of Maharashtra increased pension payments for elderly people aged 65 and above by 5%.
The solution to making the young population vote in the election is to install polling booths in places young people frequent. In many countries, the election day is a national holiday, and many young people flock to shopping malls and cinemas instead of polling stations. They feel visiting an election booth may cost them an entire day and will ruin their chance to enjoy their holiday. Hence, voting booths should be installed at places like shopping malls, as seeing these booths will stimulate young adults to participate in the voting process, and therefore, two purposes will be served, voting and entertainment. For example, in Mumbai, during the 2019 assembly election, voting booths placed at multiplexes were visited by 75% more young people than those placed in more traditional locations.
To conclude, many youngsters do not exercise their right to vote in many countries which results in the formation of a government that fails to address their problems. However, placing voting booths at places visited regularly by young adults will make voting more appealing to them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-15 | AlMightylord86 | 73 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 78
- Some young people are leaving the countryside to live in cities and towns, leaving only old people in the countryside. What problems are caused by this issue? What can be done to solve this situation? 73
- In nearly all science courses at university there are significantly more male students than female students What is the reason for this What could be done to balance out the numbers 79
- In a cashless society people use more credit cards what are the advantages and advantages 84
- In some countries younger people are neglecting their rights to vote What problems does this cause and what are some of the possible solutions 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...of polling stations. They feel visiting a election booth may cost them a entire d...
^
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...visiting a election booth may cost them a entire day and will waste their importa...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48184818482 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87959421962 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554455445545 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.7939040343 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.416666667 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10840801368 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438026156997 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373858229507 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.081119604847 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459401236971 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.