Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Analysis or judgement of any piece of work can improve it quailty. The source of judgement does play an important role for the same. The prompt says that critcial judgement is valuable from an expert than a novice. In my opinion, I agree with statement for 3 reasons.
To begin with, experience gained over the years plays a major role in providing the right assessment. A football coach, who has played hundred's of games across his career, faced every tricky situation possible, can analyse a fellow footballer's game and provide his expertise in enhancing his game. If an amateur is given the same responsibility, he may not be aware of the game tactics, or the play that actually happens on the field. The above example illustrates how constructive criticism from an expert in a field is more valuable than compared to a rookie.
Further, humans have a tendency to be awestruck with people who are pioneers in their field and tend to value them more due to their success. Success is an said to be an important measure to give preference for opinions. A young school kid, who is studying physics, might watch a youtube video from a Nobel Prize winning physicist and accept his views and claims when compared to his teacher. The fact that he is an award winning physicist is enough to stimulate his brain that most of his research is true and can be trusted. The above example explains human psychology with respect to success being a measure to one's knowledge and how crticism from such individuals has a higher preference.
To add the above statment, one might argue that no individual is 100 percent perfect in his field. But on any given day, an expert may use all his experience to figure out a solution for any given problem and there is a high chance that an amateur will struggle to cope up with the complexities being faced for the first time.
Peer judgement has always been a compelling factor in improving one's abilities. Seeking the advice of the right people will always lead to a better understanding of the subject. An individual who has immense talent and expertise would help in achieving this at faster pace than compared to a novice.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-16 | Jeyodi123 | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Anil2044 | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | AtharvaKale | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-21 | HSNDEK | 83 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | avidwriter1771 | 50 | view |
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your posi 58
- QUESTION Some people think that human needs for farmland housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals Do you agree or disagree with this point of view Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answ 76
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complain 78
- We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take 58
- The settlements of New Mexico s Chaco Canyon in American Southwest were notable for their massive stone buildings known as great houses containing hundreds of rooms and standing three or four stories high since the twelfth century A D Archeologists have b 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... a tendency to be awestruck with people who are pioneers in their field and tend to val...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...m more due to their success. Success is an said to be an important measure to give...
^^
Line 5, column 418, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: award-winning
... to his teacher. The fact that he is an award winning physicist is enough to stimulate his br...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 616, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...h respect to success being a measure to ones knowledge and how crticism from such in...
^^^^
Line 9, column 66, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s been a compelling factor in improving ones abilities. Seeking the advice of the ri...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, may, so, in my opinion, to begin with, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 377.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75862068966 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62649567871 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554376657825 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8238094969 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9444444444 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171416320571 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550276354244 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395902563691 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095260666491 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347764084951 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.