Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products , or is it the responsibility of producers?
The importance of the customers avoiding overpackaged products was always debatable and now has become controversial. The Substantial influence "if the consumers should avoid overpackaged products or is it the responsibility of producers" has sparked the controversy over the potential influence of this trend on people in recent years. It can be agreed that customers should avoid over-packaged products. This essay will elaborate on how people can be affected and lead to a logical conclusion.
First of all, when the customer buys an overpackaged product, the information is very vague whether it is safe to consume or not? As customers are usually unaware of its production and hence, don''t know if it has the right amount and quality of ingredients involved in it or not? Most of the times, a consumer ends up buying an expired product which is not conspicuous on its packaging. Which can also lead to many health problems.
However, it should be the responsibility of the producers as well. Because, if they would not believe in giving the best quality product, then it will create a huge impact on their business. Hence, can ruin their reputation and image in the market as well leading to have lesser sales and lesser no of consumers in the market.
In conclusion, I feel the consumers should avoid over-packaged products as there are many pitfalls related to it and the government should make it mandatory for every producer to be accountable if ever any incident happens.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-02-03 | Aruna Matta | 55 | view |
2020-06-15 | karan Kunal | 77 | view |
2020-06-03 | mike trazer | 55 | view |
2020-06-03 | mike trazer | view | |
2019-11-10 | heemagupta | 77 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ly unaware of its production and hence, dont know if it has the right amount and qua...
^^^^
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ch is not conspicuous on its packaging. Which can also lead to many health problems. ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...leading to have lesser sales and lesser no of consumers in the market. In concl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, so, then, well, i feel, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 246.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09756097561 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05199830189 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573170731707 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6397291355 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350492439566 0.242375264174 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123466859639 0.0925447433944 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109523684314 0.071462118173 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213918808134 0.151781067708 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0961313349682 0.0609392437508 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.