The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a county in 1950 and 2010.
The given pie charts compare the proportion of money spent on an average in a household in the context of five different sectors in a county over a period of 60 years from 1950 to 2010.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that housing, which was the major investment area in 1950, has reduced dramatically over the period. Although all the other sectors have grown significantly, the food sector has witnessed a tremendous investment hike.
According to the given illustration, nearly three-fourth of the total income was diverted to the housing needs in 1950, followed next by food(11.2%) and education(6.6%). However, healthcare, transportation, and other spendings observed a marginal share of only 2.4%, 3.3%, and 4.4% respectively.
After nearly half a century, the expenditure share for housing plummeted sharply by one-third(72% down to 22%). On the contrary, over time the investment in other categories expanded at a significant rate. With almost five times increment, spendings in other areas rose to 19.2%. An investment surge in transportation climbed the value higher by four times(14%). Also, the spending on food soared up by nearly three-fold(11.2% rose to 34%). However, education and healthcare experienced a slight uptick of only 0.3% and 2.1% respectively.
- The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984 89
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries 78
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports center now and how it will look after redevelopment 84
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a county in 1950 and 2010 84
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, third, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1099.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41379310345 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21822324553 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635467980296 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9670391494 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9090909091 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139365786705 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406547998319 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907398770581 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100309444915 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127901194776 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.