Some people believe that children can learn effectively by watching TV and they should be encouraged to watch TV both at home and at school. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
It is true that studying from a TV programme can help studen gain knowledge more easily, young adults should watch TV frequently. While I accept that watching TV can be a good resource for children to study, I believe that spending too much time sitting in front of the TV is not healthy.
On the one hand, using TV programmes as a teaching material is a modern and effective approach to education. For the learner, it would be easier to memorise things and more interesting due to the connection of images and sound.
For example, there are only words and pictures in school textbooks which makes students feel bored compared to watching documentaries and historical films etc.
On the other hand, I believe that watching TV too often can bring a negative influence on child’s development. Firstly, not every TV channel would be useful. For instance, violence is readily found in movies and disturbing topics are often reported on the news. Children can easily imitate what they see on screen. Secondly, most exams are focused on academic subjects. If students had to learn everything from watching TV and not putting what they learn into practical use, writing for example, it would lead to bad exam results. Finally, children would be less healthy. They would spend far too much time focusing on an electronic screen for learning and these products are harmful to the eyes when used for long periods.
In conclusion, while watching TV is a beneficial way of gaining an education, I do not agree that spending a lot of time in front of a TV is helpful for children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-03 | thaotrinh | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-23 | imjessiego | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | J a Hermione | 56 | view |
- In some countries around the world men and women are having babies late in life what are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 47
- Two main maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have to many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83763837638 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6455531632 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579335793358 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3667461424 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6428571429 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319161306329 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111330524937 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771673442702 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172933030981 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849611745216 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.