Is hosting the Olympic Games bring any benefit to the host countries?
Recently, the phenomenon of hosting the Olympic Games and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of the host countries are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that sports events can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, hosting the Olympic Games can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of lucrative events, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of modern countries. Thus, beneficial ramifications of sophisticated athletes are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, hosting sports events can supply the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of poor countries are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described costly events. Hence, predicted outcomes of hosted countries are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of hosting the Olympic Games far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the host countries prove the significance of physical games, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-23 | Alireza.r.m | 88 | view |
| 2020-02-23 | Alireza.r.m | 88 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | mojtaba1980 | 80 | view |
- It is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature To what extent you agree Give example 88
- People should sometimes do things that they do not enjoy doing such as learning a new language Do you agree or disagree with the statement 88
- Nowadays more and more people believed that overburden can help complete higher quality in achievements For example professional teachers coaches believe that this applies to students and athletes on the individual and national level What is your point of 85
- Nowadays the mass media including TV radio and newspaper have become the essential part of our lives What is your opinion 88
- Experience is a more effective way to teach compared to books Agree or disagree 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1256.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 224.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60714285714 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11000227623 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638392857143 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9196605428 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.181818182 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35378839595 0.242375264174 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120970361949 0.0925447433944 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101251724966 0.071462118173 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204782500244 0.151781067708 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690842240687 0.0609392437508 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.9 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.