The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014.
The maps give information about the changing of the waterfront area of Darwin town from 2009 to 2014.
Overall, there were some facilities added in this area and the most significant change is the replacement of green spaces in the industrial zones.
In 2009, there were two industrial areas at the center of the waterfront, which were separated by three blocks of residential and the footpath. After five years, this area was obliterated to make room for covering by a lot of trees. The larger side of the old industrial buildings and there was a new university building was constructed. On the smaller side, a part of the old area was converted into a swimming pool while the school convention centre and two former swimming fool pool remained unchanged.
In addition, the changes involve the improvement of transport infrastructure. There was a newly built harbor on the seashore and a footpath to connect the harbor with the main road in the west of the town. In contrast, the footpath which encircles the centre of the town was untouched.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-06 | maiphuonganh | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | baoquyen1906 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | phamkhuyen | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-14 | ThHuong | 87 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | kieutrangkg1 | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn
- In June 1996 an experimental flu vaccine was trialed in a large country town on females only Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 78
- The pie charts provided illustrate two major changes in the use of modes of transport to a certain university between 2004 and 2009 90
- The line graph below shows the cases of diseases caused by X virus in Australia from 1960 to 1995 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 100
- Research shows that business meetings discussions and training are happening online nowadays Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 877.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92696629213 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80339330337 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573033707865 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5104717907 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4444444444 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204817672348 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909221901964 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118958814935 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159040617986 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145757280386 0.0819641961636 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.