The maps below show the changes that have taken place in the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014.
Presented are the two illustrations depicting several significant changes which have taken place in Darwin town in the 5-year period commencing from 2009.
Overall, the town has witnessed several changes with the most noticeable being the disappearance of the industrial area and the appearance of a harbour.
From 2009 to 2010, almost the facilities near the lake stayed unchanged, except for the industrial area to the left-hand side of the lake, which has been replaced by a swimming pool. In the centre of the municipality, the residential building was greatly expanded.
In 2009, there was an industrial area at the bottom of Darwin; however, till 2010, it has been converted into a field for trees and also constructed a university building near there. Besides, the space between the sea and the swimming pool to the East of the town has been added as a harbour. From this, a new footpath was erected to the West of Darwin town.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-06 | maiphuonganh | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | baoquyen1906 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | phamkhuyen | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-14 | ThHuong | 87 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | kieutrangkg1 | 78 | view |
- The two maps below show the changes in the town of Stokeford from 1930 to 2010 61
- The diagram shows the life cycle of a frog 61
- The line graph below shows the average carbon dioxide C02 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons when relevant 56
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, so, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 786.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9746835443 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7723541918 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588607594937 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.92015018 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.285714286 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237929559292 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102385441524 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780052388557 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14697626255 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0813158249903 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.