Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions Discuss in both views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government , while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions. Discuss in both views and give your own opinion.

In recent decades, there are more and more young people holding important positions in the government offices, causing some public controversy. Depsite the suggested that young individuals should be authorized to such positions, I believe that they are not suitable for these postitions.
On the one hand, it is clear that young individuals take on important positions in the governmental institutions could be fraught with many pitfalls for a nation. Initially, due to lack of practical expertises and also country's understanding, young leaders could write unproductive policies which cannot be applied to national situations, leading to negative impacts on their country. For example, in Vietnamese history, Tran Phu, who is 26 years old general secretary, claimed that solving class confliction problems was a top-tier mission, creating famines across the country by foreign invaders. Moreover, by being exposed to foreign education, young generation could be exposed to foreign ideologies which are different from old participants, leading to governmental internal conflicts. For instance, Vietnam pursues socialism inclining to the benefit of the community, whereas, young people tend to follow individualism which is associated with capitalism, conditioning to political turmoil.
On the other hand, young employees in the government system bring many advantages for a country. Specifically, since the young are approached to progressive education ages , they have creative perspectives and ideas more than their seniors. In fact, the government always seek for novel ideas in order to solve backlog problems because the old participants’visions could be conversative and non-conforming to national advancements nowadays. As a result, youngers could promulgate innovative and effective policies, promoting their nation to keep pace with the innovation of the world.
In conclusion, young people should be authorized to trivial positions in the branches of the government in order to gain experiences and appropriate political ideologies before taking on managerial positions. Despite the benefit of young individuals entitled to important positions in the government, official authorities should be more prudent in authorizing young leaders to bring the best benefits to the nation.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-02-04 camille1104 70 view
2022-01-15 bfun 56 view
2022-01-04 dnthao2932018 56 view
2021-06-24 nkninh 73 view
2021-05-31 xinyu961121 61 view
Essays by user hanhkatori2402 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...approached to progressive education ages , they have creative perspectives and ide...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87125748503 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25956754413 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574850299401 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.1566331173 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.846153846 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6923076923 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271055074519 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104238746677 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732723828739 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187375707356 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629065450033 0.056905535591 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.