People are living in a “throwaway society”, using things for a short time and then throwing them away. What are the causes of this? What problems does it lead to?
“Throwaway sociey” has been highlighted as an emerging issue in recent decades due to its influence on social development. Despite this trend’s popularity is increasing, the negative implications could be pronounced.
There are many reasons behind this “throwaway society”. First, because of technological advancement, products are constantly updated and released by manufacturers in the latest version of things even the short distance with their nearest one, encouraging buyers purchasing for the new version with more features in order to show their wealthiness and fashionableness. For example, they would spend money on iPhone 11 – the latest version of Apple’s smartphone regardless of the durability of their old ones, resulting in disposing of their outdated versions for a short using time. Second, since people nowadays do not have enough time for cooking, they order foods and drinks contained by disposable plastic items, which are proved to be convenient for not requiring washing effort after use. As a result, the disposable products are not reused by users, conditioning to the disposal of such products for single use.
However, this pattern could be fraught with several pitfalls. First, if individuals always keep pace with the trend while buying for the updated version of things and throwing their old ones, they could get into serious debt. It means that this lifestyle could be money-consuming as new and best-seller items permanently are sold at prohibitive prices for who desire to own them in the early stages they debuted, leading to individual of finance. Second, by being consequences of excessive consumption of disposable items, a huge amount of hazardous waste is discharged into the environment, conditioning to contaminated soil and groundwater. In fact, these products are disposed to landfills where they are buried into the soil, relating to soil and groundwater pollution.
In conclusion, the cause for “throwaway society” could be formed by people shopping style and the consumption of disposable goods. Nonetheless, the negative impact on individuals’ finance and environmental sustainability could make people think twice before any investment and usage.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-07-07 | dinhthu05 | 61 | view |
2020-11-15 | lhm.ils | 89 | view |
2020-08-23 | hanhkatori2402 | 80 | view |
2019-01-30 | Architecture | 79 | view |
- Young people are now spending more and more time and money following fashion trends What is your opinion Is this a positive or negative development 84
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 78
- Proponents of animal testing say that it has enabled the development of many life saving treatments for both humans and animals that there is no alternative method for researching a complete living organism and that strict regulations prevent the mistreat 56
- Some people feel that young people should follow the traditions of their society Others however believe that young people should be free to behave as individuals Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 335 350
No. of Characters: 1813 1500
No. of Different Words: 201 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.278 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.412 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.985 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 136 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 104 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 76 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 57 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.929 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.457 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.308 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.535 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.058 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5