People are living in a ‘throwaway society’, using things for a short time and then throwing them away. What are the causes of this? What problems does it lead to?
In today’s world, people are living in a consumerism culture. To put it in another way, people are more likely to use the items they have for a short time then discard them instead of fixing them up to reuse. In this essay, an attempt will be made to investigate the factors which have led to this phenomenon and also examine the issues which have resulted from it.
To begin with, the most frequent factor contributing to this trend is that in this day and age, there is mass production of non-durable goods which are often used once and thrown away. To rephrase, these products are much cheaper and more convenient than durable ones. Therefore, this type of products catches the attraction of a large number of customers. One example to demonstrate this view is that according to the statistics of Earthday, about one trillion single-use plastic bags are used annually across the globe. Consequently, disposable plastic bags are much cheaper than other kinds of package. For that reason, people tend to abandon the items they used rather than fix them.
As the information mentioned above, this trend is caused by several reasons regarding excessive production. Consequently, there are numerous negative influence that will arise from this situation. However, the most outstanding effect which can be easily seen is that this social trend is contributing to the seriousness of green issues due to more waste, especially plastic and chemicals which take hundreds of years to decompose, is discharged into surroundings. Meanwhile, the vast majority of this is untreated directly aggravating soil, air and water pollution. This is shown by the following statistics. In fact, of the 8.3 billion metric tons that has been produced, 6.3 billion metric tons has become plastic waste. Of that, only 9% has been recycled. To rephrase, the vast majority of that is accumulating in landfills or slaughtering off in the natural environment as litter. As these figures reveal, it is undisputed that this trend exacerbates the situation of the environment these days.
Given the aforementioned points, it may be concluded that the consumerism culture is attributed to the enormous production in the contemporary world, which leads to the seriousness of the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-07 | dinhthu05 | 61 | view |
| 2020-11-15 | lhm.ils | 89 | view |
| 2020-08-23 | hanhkatori2402 | 80 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | Architecture | 79 | view |
- Some people think that government spending on the restoration of old buildings in cities should be stopped Instead they should spend the money on housing and road development To what extent do you agree 67
- The table below gives information about students studying in six departments in an Australian university in 2011 Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant 50
- An increasing number of people are buying what they need online What are the advantages and disadvantages for both individuals and companies to shopping online 92
- Because of modern technology it is no longer necessary for people to learn handwriting skills but others believe that handwriting is still an important skill Discuss both views and give our opinion 89
- The picture below shows the changes of a park from 1980 to now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 329, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e of products catches the attraction of a large number of customers. One example to demonstrate t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, may, regarding, so, then, therefore, while, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17711171662 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88600753481 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553133514986 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8179172775 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3157894737 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26315789474 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1863276256 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521091056326 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554763193387 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10508261642 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649801417247 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.