Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Routine monitoring and regualar checkups can help to reduce the sheer wastage of resources provided by the company for improving the efficiency of the employees. So, I agree with the issue and would explain the consequences of implememnting this issue and point out the two implications of it.
The company should explain the policy to the employees, wherein the employees will know that their computers are being monitored. This will ensure a healthy relationship and command trust between the employer and employee and make the employee feel valued and promote a strong sense of urge to not waste any resources that will prove deleterious to the company's esteem. Thereby, this policy will reinforce both the objectives, to keep the employee informed and happy. The employee too will keep doing their work efficaciously with an attitude for the welfare of the company. This way the effects of the policy will prove beneficial for both the company and its employees
The company provides a lot of resources to the employees so that the employee's work productivity remains high and they can finish their work easily within time. For this reason companies provide laptops, notepads, subsidised food, etc which benefits the employee alot. So as a rightful owner of these resources, the company does have a right to monitor their resources which would help them improve these services for their new as well as existing employees. One of them is, conducting thorough checkups for email correspondence, which will benefit to keep the servers free of cache, irrelevant folder and files and improving the bandwidth to ensure the email communication is agile and not lagging. For example, a group of employee might not be cleaning their inbox and spam folder of their email, which could eat up space of other employees, thus hindering the others from performing their duties on time. Thus, this policy would improve the whole companies performance gaps, if any. Moroever, might increase their efficiency significantly.
Although, some employees might say that this policy could be infinging their rights of checking their emails without consent, but when the whole policy is proving benficial to the whole organsiation, it should be the employees responsibility to think of himself as a part of the organisation and give his consent for carrying out this process immediately.
Therefore, the policy is advantageous for the company and would help them earn trustworthy employees and keep the company lucrative and free of any issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-30 | DCAD123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | Aaishani De | 58 | view |
| 2022-10-16 | Chaitanya02 | 50 | view |
| 2022-10-06 | asm01 | 83 | view |
| 2022-06-27 | Nalu00 | 75 | view |
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs 60
- TOEFL integrated writing fuel cell engines 60
- Pirouettes Ballet School is the clear choice for any child Of all the dance schools in Elmtown Pirouettes has the most intensive program and our teachers have danced in the most prestigious ballet companies all over the world Many of our students have gon 58
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 75
- Do you agree or disagree technology has made children more creative than in the past support your answer with reasons and examples 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... point out the two implications of it. The company should explain the policy to...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for both the company and its employees The company provides a lot of resources ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 955, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...us, this policy would improve the whole companies performance gaps, if any. Moroever, mig...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rease their efficiency significantly. Although, some employees might say that ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 222, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...he whole organsiation, it should be the employees responsibility to think of himself as a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ying out this process immediately. Therefore, the policy is advantageous fo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2127.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 407.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22604422604 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78688204642 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5085995086 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.4590480583 60.3974514979 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.8 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1333333333 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.93333333333 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212990977146 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833335367669 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526613874378 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120924129362 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442183514599 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.1392134831 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.