The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
As we can see, the line graph illustrates the fluctuations in birth rates in countries like China and the United States between the years of 1920 to 2000.
In general, the USA started at the top, while China was at the bottom in the year 1920. However, China toped the graph in the year 1950, but the results stayed the same with the USA being at the top once again and China remained at the bottom in the year 2000.
From 1920 to 1950, the USA birth rate (11%) was almost 1% higher than China (10%). Both the countries birth rate increased by one percent over the span of five years; however, both the country's birth rate returned to their starting position in the year 1930. In the next five years, China showed a sudden increase of 5% reaching 15% in total; in contrast, the USA birth rate was two percent less than China's birth rate in the year 1935. Moving forward, both the countries birth rate dropped to 5% during the next ten years. In 1945, China and the USA skyrocketed reaching up to 20% and 15% respectively. This was the highest birth rate percentage recorded by China during the whole 80 years span.
During the years 1955 to 1960, China highly focused on controlling its birth rate reaching just under 10%, in the same manner, the USA reached 12% during the same time period. Finally, the birth rate of both countries continued to decrease the same way making 7% for the USA and 2% for China in the year 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-11 | thaiha123 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | teulimin.06 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | trucvy112233 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-04 | dhq.testbig | 78 | view |
- Employment rates 73
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- There is an increasing trend of antisocial behavior by individuals and in most cases it is blamed on society How can society be the blame What needs to be done about these people 73
- Waste disposal in four cities 67
- Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching With the technology available today there is no justification for it and everything should be done online To what extent do you agree or disagree Give your own opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47328244275 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.12370541774 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480916030534 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6675151429 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.545454545 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258565063372 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12711194038 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049366973087 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177559700116 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364894137289 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.