Sample topic: When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Life is impermanent, so everything is changing in each and every moment, and so do traditional skills. While many believe it will disappear in the digital revolution, I would deem that our ancestor’s cultural wisdom still manifests in its new form.
To begin with, that is true to some extent that ancestral methods are gradually rarer in the modern world. That is because the youngster might not be able to make the food with the cultural recipes due to the development of instantaneous technology. For example, they can order a meal to their bed within a click on a so-called smartphone or quickly feel better from a fever by using painkillers instead of traditional herbs. The old way to experience and enjoy life thus seems to be outdated for the Millenials.
People disapproved of this, however, should not have obsessed too much because something can not go to nothing, and vice versa. There is only a transformation with its possibility. For instance, agricultural technology helps society yield more productive crops with the best taste all year round, which is based on ancestral wisdom. And the way we cook with the same traditional recipe now is much more efficient instead of time-consuming compared to the ancient techniques. And hence, the old skills did not disappear. People may need to look into things, and they will see our ancestors’ thinking and habit is still alive within us in the daily basis, such as the way we drive, work, eat and drink. Paradoxically, they are the manifestation of a new form carried out by their children.
The question should have had more clarity about whether or not our current generation is different from our ancestors. To answer this, I believe they are no different, and they are not the same. Everything is interbeing and interpenetration. This is because that is, and that is because that is. In us, there is tradition; and vice versa, there are changing moments within tradition toward the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-11 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-03 | Chaman Bhardwaj | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-28 | mindfulielts | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Prabhp | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | kajalbhuva | 63 | view |
- the inequality between rich and poor nations 89
- Some people believe that it is wrong to keep animals in zoos while others think that zoos are both entertaining and ecologically important Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people believe that it is the responsibility of individuals to take care of their own health and diet Others however believe that governments should make sure that their citizens have a healthy diet Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Many criminals commit further crimes as soon as they released from prison What do you think are the causes of this What possible solutions can you suggest 84
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: NOT_NOTHING[1]
Message: Double negation. You probably should say 'anything'.
Suggestion: anything
...oo much because something can not go to nothing, and vice versa. There is only a transf...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 49, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...tion should have had more clarity about whether or not our current generation is different fro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, look, may, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9696969697 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91924364709 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593939393939 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 0.809619238477 988% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3254585852 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1111111111 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15094309277 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429363830789 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0261300971278 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0834165350115 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295606664378 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.