*Task 2*
"Studies show that criminals get low level of education. Some people believe that the best way to reduce the crime is educating people in prison so they can get a job after leaving prison. To what extent do you agree or disagree?"
As research depicts that felons do not get a high level of education, some postulate that by schooling them during the term of a sentence, crime might be reduced. I completely agree with this belive, as it could potentially improve ex-convicts chance of getting a job.
On the one side, destitution is a common reason for a person turning into a criminal. Therefore, acquiring a job and associated with it income, might stop a person from reoffending. For example, recent research conducted by University of Keele shows, that out of prisoners who gained minimum a college level education 87% did not commit further crimes. Meanwhile, out of those who did not get any tuition, as much as 73% returned to the prison within five years. Thus gaining education during penitentiary, might bring attainable benefits by reducing the rate of subsequent crimes.
On the other side, education has i its own value and gives people a better understanding of the world around them. Although people with a master degree can commit a crime, the rates of offences are much lower amongst well-educated individuals. According to the police statistics published in The Guardian last year, people with no formal education are responsible for 78% of all the crime, while those with a university degree for 3%. Therefore, schooling might hold an ethical value and increase in prisoners knowledge could make them more beneficial members of the society.
In conclusion, I strongly belive that improving the level of education of prisoners is the best way of pulling them out of live of offence, thus reducing the crime.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-28 | kamalena | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 67 | view |
- Why is the number of bikes increasing What can be down 89
- GOVERNMENT SHOULD FUND SCIENTIFIC RATHER THAN COMMERCIAL ORGANIZATION TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH THE STATEMENT 56
- Science and technology are more important than history 78
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places that are difficult such as Sahara and Antarctic What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places 67
- Pie chart land degeneration 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07575757576 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84295885649 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602272727273 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8416219576 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.666666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26938249847 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897823621431 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053239783571 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165022088415 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314572259657 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.