More and more companies are allowing employees to work from home Do you think this is a positive or negative development

In the present age, it is a prevalent issue for people to work from home on account of advance in technology and widespread use of internet. Although, I think this development has some benefits for staffs and enterprises, its drawbacks should not be underestimated.
On the positive side, employees who are working at their accommodation would have more freedom rather than being at workplace. In fact, this can be helpful to manage their time when they are forced to concentrate on multiple subjects. Furthermore, working at official places is exceedingly stressful due to working without a break and heavy burden of responsibilities. In this case, employees would have a private atmosphere and feel convenient while they are working the house. Additionally, it is an approach for reduction of transportation expenses which is quite optimum for commuters.
On the other hand, despite these beneficial aspects, remote working has several disadvantages. Firstly, employees would be deprived of working as a group with other colleagues, thus they cannot expose their entire information. Secondly, this method of working made staff members inactive and lazy because they have more hours at home, and they often get up late. Finally, sometimes employees have feeling about lack of confidence to communicate with others or make a speech in a conference. Actually, this is rooted in the fact that staffs need to be in formal groups to have concrete relations and eye contacts.
In conclusion, however, this approach of working remotely has both sides of benefits and drawbacks for employees and companies, this issue depends on how situations should be handled appropriately to thwart harmful consequences.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, thus, while, i think, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36567164179 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09536010456 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623134328358 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0645443739 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.615384615 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9230769231 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234750398193 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785271615253 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483522919503 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139435469174 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216178199436 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.