Co2 emissions in between 1967 and 2007.
The line chart illustrates how much carbon dioxide (CO2) was produced by a person in 4 different countries: United Kingdom (UK), Portugal, Sweden and Italy from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, it is noticeable that the average CO2 emissions per person in Italy and Portugal increased significantly, while it referring to UK and Sweden were in the opposite side. Furthermore, although the amount of CO2 each citizens in uk released declined slightly for 40 years, in 2007, it still ranked first compared to other countries.
As can be seen obviously, uk was the country which had the highest quantity of CO2 emissions per person in 40 years, at about 11 metric tonnes (mt) in the initial year despite decreasing to nearly 9 mt in the last year. Similarly, average individual CO2 production in Sweden went down rapidly to reach the bottom at under 6 mt after rising constantly to 2 more mt for the period from 1967 to 1977.
Conversely, Italy and Portugal's amount of CO2 released by a person went up in the same manner even though it of the previous country was nearly 3 mt higher than the second one, at over 4 mt in comparison to nearly 1 mt in the first year. This two countries rose up slightly for the first 30 years before having a standability until 2007, at about 8 mt and 5.5 mt respectively.
- People should look after their health for personal benefits rather than a duty for a society To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 56
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should spend about 20 minutes on this task You should write at lea 74
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 100
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, furthermore, if, second, similarly, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60434782609 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71876834674 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.3127736861 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.285714286 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8571428571 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 5.23603664747 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197564670226 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993290683562 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434655299209 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134165589488 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048962837533 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.