Today’s schools should teach their students how to survive financially in the world today. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
There are contrasting opinions whether youngsters need to be taught financial affairs. While some may question the idea, I completely agree that this kind of schemes would be beneficiary to the students and the society as a whole.
Learning variety of essential skills at schools certainly guarantees a prosperous future and monetarily issues are not exception. Pupils spend a share amount of their time at schools which is expected to be fruitful not merely memorizing theoretical knowledge. Furthermore, students and their parents cannot find more reliable person than pedagogues to patiently work with students solely for the purpose of teaching financial fulfillment. For example, School can provide systematic approaches of tackling monetary issues as they do with other subjects. In addition to that, offering these courses may absorb even more students than before as they see the programs more practical and probably reduce truancy. Finally as students are not responsible for family income, the learning process will be less stressful and more like a game through which the importance of money management is taught.
Detractor of the opinion may say that these programs may undermine other subjects like art and music. They may be right but if we want to prioritize subjects according to their extent of influence on children’s future, financially fulfilled people will be more desirable. This proposition, however, does not intend to question the value of art and literature. Unnecessary stress is another matter of objection which is true if school children are required to make profit. But the programs aim for teaching the same as children are taught biology but no one is expected to be a biologist.
In conclusion, in my view, essentially of financial matters requires schools to prepare the youth for better and more efficient approaches of dealing with financial issues.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-09-17 | deolkuljeet1991 | 73 | view |
2021-07-02 | thuyminhptm | 73 | view |
2020-08-11 | aghaei.arsalan | 67 | view |
2019-09-21 | Billynguyen1225 | 84 | view |
- Some people say that the main way to be happy in life is to have a lot of money How might having a lot of money make people happy What other things in life can make people happy 87
- The money spent by governments on space programmes would be better spent on vital public services such as schools and hospitals To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people say that the best way to improve public heath is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are require Discuss both these view and give your own 84
- In many countries truancy is a worrying problem for both parents and educators What are the causes of truancy and what may be the effects on the child and the wider community 78
- For career development people are required to learn and apply various types of skills at work While speaking in public is an important talent it cannot be accounted as the most significant feature 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mpletely agree that this kind of schemes would be beneficiary to the students and...
^^
Line 2, column 507, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rovide systematic approaches of tackling monetary issues as they do with other su...
^^
Line 2, column 712, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
... practical and probably reduce truancy. Finally as students are not responsible for fam...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, however, if, may, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35906040268 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84505383718 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597315436242 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2744133193 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.071428571 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147147526555 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509710502747 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037083467731 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907674275607 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257083153416 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.