The maps below show the changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2015 and present day

Essay topics:

The maps below show the changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2015 and present day.

The map given offers insight into the transformation of the art gallery ground floor from 2015 to present day.
The most striking features from the illustration are that while the left side of the floor witnessed most remarkable changes, the opposite was true of the right side over the period surveyed.
During the period from 2015 to present day, the room was expended further to the left side with the disappearance of a gallery office. Moreover, a reception area was relocated to the new position which is closer to the entrance hall. There is lift next to the stairs now and the café located on the top left corner of the floor was converted into a new gallery shop with the vending machine constructed outside.
In addition, the right side of this floor stay unchanged, whereas, there was a rearrangement of an exhibition room 4. It was divided into a temporary one and a children area. The final change of this floor was the emergence of a ramp for wheel chair located outside the gallery.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-18 nnglinh 84 view
2021-08-29 datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com 73 view
2021-07-16 TranMinhDuc 78 view
2021-07-05 Trangdodo 84 view
2021-07-05 Trangdodo 67 view
Essays by user longle251198 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, whereas, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73142857143 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59198135544 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0607400688 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243668038452 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112586879844 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149613675874 0.0843802449381 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181143755294 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.177169365361 0.0819641961636 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.