Artistic freedom has been of paramount importance in the progress of forging excellence and exceptionality. Its irreplaceable function leads some people to argue that total freedom should be encouraged among any artists. The following paragraphs of this essay will reason why I partly agree with the statement above.
To begin with, it is undeniable that artistic creativity can be sophisticatedly cultivated when there is no authoritatively oppressing restrictions on the subjects. Imagine a condition in which some particular artistic themes are proscribed by powerful political parties or despots as a means of hegemony. Under that scenario, arts have been no longer precious works but a display of flamboyant and decadent schemes solely belonged to the string pullers. Such works are bound to be run-of-the-mill as the imagination and capability of their creators are molded into some kinds of machines that countenance merely political-oriented goals but not compassion and prosperity of humans in general. That is to say, artistic creativity is prone to be impeded by controlling and coercion.
Having said that, total artistic freedom is much likely to be turned into a pernicious apparatus under the hands of mendacious and rebellious creators themselves. There are certain ideologies and behaviors which are indecorous and misleading enough to cause pandemonium and distress among the most harmonious groups. To put it in another way, there are still some masquerading artworks that intrinsically provokes sexual desires, abusive propensity and cupidity among the meaningful ones. Such images are much likely to be a catalyst for self-abnegation, public devastation and moral corruption among susceptible targets. How could one live in a stable and satisfying way provided that the ugly things on the paintings hanged over his society is existent and continues to threaten his life? Therefore, to maintain social stability and modesty, governmental curation in arts will be one of the most instrumental guidances for its people in dark times.
In a nutshell, although artistic freedom serves as a powerful tool to enhance creativity and expand our artistic horizon, it is highly important that with governmental curation it do not get out of hand and turn into indirect machine guns and latent bombs ingrained in our society.
- people believe the society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging However others argue that there are still some advantages of adverts Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people think that the internet has brought people closer together while others think that people and communities are become more isolated Discuss both sides give your opinion 78
- Artists need a certain amount of freedom to develop their creativity Some people think that artists should have total freedom to express any thoughts and ideas To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think it is a waste of valuable money 90
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...partly agree with the statement above. To begin with, it is undeniable that art...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e impeded by controlling and coercion. Having said that, total artistic freedom...
^^^^
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ges are much likely to be a catalyst for self-abnegation, public devastation and ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uidances for its people in dark times. In a nutshell, although artistic freedom...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 186, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'does'?
Suggestion: does
...tant that with governmental curation it do not get out of hand and turn into indir...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, therefore, in general, to begin with, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1981.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48753462604 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18047522975 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606648199446 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3097240804 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.066666667 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0666666667 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229797242019 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704992483456 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613551518018 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142526386326 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503316076684 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.