It has been said that reading for pleasure is better in developing imagination and language skills than watching TV. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often argued that reading is the best pleasure activity over watching TV as it develops creative thinking and communication skills. I completely agree to this argument as reading always cultivates intelligence and visualization capabilities whereas television could bring severe health issues in ones life.
On the one hand, reading as a free-time activity develops creativity and language skills in the individuals. Reading famous novels such as "The Alchemist" by Paulo Coehlo, for instance, helps the rader to visualize the beautiful landscapes and people narrated in the story without seeing them. Each ones imagination would be different in theor own ways. In addition to that, they get familearize with the type of language the charecters speak in the scenes. These features shape the individual with the developed intelligence and linguistic skills which they could use in their furture. Besides, while reading, everyone goes through every printed alphabets and words that appear to enhance a strong vocabulary to the reader.
In contrast, watching television for a longer time bring only instantaneous entertainment with a lot of severe health issues and lifestyle chaos. For example, a successful talk show by a celebrity, such as 'Ellen's show' takes away much amount of time from its viewers daily and they await the next episode eagerly alloting the time. In fact, they are productively zero in such times and by doing this they become lazy and obese. Once addicted, it is difficult and expensive to bring them back to normal life style. Moreover such TV programs do not create any useful attributes in the viewer as all the information is already presented with much of visual and content-rich formats.
In conclusion, reading is always appear to help people in creating new attributes like imagination and communication skills. Watching television could only harm an individual by making one unhealthy and sedentary. It is hoped that people allocate only required time in front of television and focus more on reading of books.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-28 | parabshreyas | 61 | view |
| 2020-08-22 | appu161 | 70 | view |
| 2020-08-20 | appu161 | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-20 | Ronald88 | 75 | view |
| 2019-01-14 | rekharastogi | 66 | view |
- There have been some problems with public transport in your area recently Write a letter to the manager of the public transport company In your letter Describe the problems Explain how these problems are affecting the public Suggest what changes could be 89
- Write a letter to your manager about a computer system problem that you have encountered and say Describe the problem How it is affecting your work What needs to be done about it
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 11
- It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects What are the causes And what will be effected on society 61
- It has been said that reading for pleasure is better in developing imagination and language skills than watching TV To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 303, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ion could bring severe health issues in ones life. On the one hand, reading as a ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 514, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...o bring them back to normal life style. Moreover such TV programs do not create any usef...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'appeared'.
Suggestion: appeared
...ts. In conclusion, reading is always appear to help people in creating new attribut...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33742331288 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91059523214 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598159509202 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1508748215 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.75 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179988434381 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562622388634 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484167603365 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109019600603 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385908242123 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.