Today, people can work and live anywhere they want, because of the improvement of communication technology and transport. Do advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Thanks to technological innovations such as the internet, wireless telephony and faster modes of transport, people can now live and work in any part of the globe. In my opinion, the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages.
There are certainly many benefits to being able to live and work anywhere. First of all, people have more choices of jobs because of technological advances. Not only can they work from any part of their home country, but they can also work for any company in any part of the world through telecommuting. Gone are the days when people had to be physically present in the office to be able to work. Now from the comfort of their home, they can serve clients living in other continents. Modern wireless technology has also made work easier and created more time for self and family. Better still, people can lessen their work hours and still accomplish their tasks more efficiently and with less effort.
The transport sector has also seen revolutionary changes. Thanks to services like metro, the travel time has reduced considerably. This has also enabled people living in the countryside to work in cities. Earlier people had to move to cities to find employment there. Now they can live in the serene countryside and still have a flourishing career in the city. This has decreased the overcrowding of cities and made them more livable.
Of course, there are some downsides to being able to live and work anywhere. This flexibility and convenience has actually made people physically inactive and led to some health problems. In addition, it has made people dependent on technology. Actually, life now comes to a standstill in the event of a network failure or system breakdown. Nevertheless, these minor drawbacks are negligible when we consider the benefits.
In conclusion, while it is true that advancement in technology has led people to a sedentary lifestyle, it is a minor drawback that pales in comparison to the multitude of benefits offered by technology and innovations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-01 | harman36 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-01 | harman36 | 58 | view |
| 2021-05-30 | Aman aman | 71 | view |
| 2020-08-24 | nainsi1991@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2020-08-24 | nainsi1991@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- You recently organised an all day meeting for your company which took place in a local hotel In their feedback participants at the meeting said that they liked the hotel but they were unhappy about the food that was served for lunch Write a letter to the 84
- In some societies the number of crime committed by teenagers is growing Some people think that regardless of age teenagers who commit major crime receive adult punishment To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Food travels thousands of miles from producers to consumers. Some people think that it would be better for the environment and economy if people ate only the local food produced by farmers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some parents think that helping their children with homework is good Others think children should do their homework on their own Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Some people believe that to be successful at a sport you need natural ability and others think that hard work and practice can make you successful. Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...f the world through telecommuting. Gone are the days when people had to be physical...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, nevertheless, so, still, while, in addition, in conclusion, of course, such as, first of all, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05952380952 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87639840781 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517857142857 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0996426025 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.9523809524 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.19047619048 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316313624296 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879390803771 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605213976302 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173640517911 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810433690524 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.