A 4-week holiday can make employees do better at job. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Since work environment nowadays is tremendously full of heavy workloads, employees can experience tension. In addition, it is one measurement that workers should be provided a 4-week holiday annually in order to encourage better performances at work.Personally, I strongly incline to this point of view.
To begin with,many advantageous aspects related to leisure occasions help employees to increase their prductivity on a great scale. In addition, there are still many workers who are compelled to work for a long duration and take less day off. In addition, these people likely to engage in many mental problems such as anxiety, depression. Hence, it is widely believed that a short period of vacation can reset their mind and enhance not only consciousness but also productivity in their later performances. For instance, believing in the benefit of holidays, many local companies in HCM city have presented their employees a 4-week holiday as an encouragementto push them work harder in the future.
Moreover, longer holidays can spark creativity. Bringing up many out-standing strategies is usually not the person who commits to work a whole day, but someone who can get outside and enjoy their day-off. The more leisure time an employee has, the more inspired he or she can become. As a result, it would not only benefit personal performances, but it also positively affects the development of a whole company, leading to an effective performance.
Taking everything into consideration, a 4-week holiday is what productivity and creativity are all about.In my viewpoint, I believe that this strategy is an impressive contributor to a business success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-14 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-13 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
- Employer should focus on personal qualities over qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job To what extend do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 78
- 31 The percentage and exact time weekly males and females spent on house tasks in 2010 of a country 89
- Scientists have been warning for many years about protecting the environment and we must limit the use of energy in our daily lives Despite warnings many people do not do this What are the reasons for that and how people can be encouraged to take interest 84
- The picture below shows the plant of museum in 1998 and after some changes was made in 2008 The maps illustrate changes which took place in the floor layout of a museum during the period of 10 years which began in 1998 49
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 251, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Personally
...o encourage better performances at work.Personally, I strongly incline to this point of vi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , many
...ne to this point of view. To begin with,many advantageous aspects related to leisure...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 671, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... holiday as an encouragementto push them work harder in the future. Moreover, lo...
^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...oductivity and creativity are all about.In my viewpoint, I believe that this strat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, moreover, so, still, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35877862595 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17496691231 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641221374046 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1723612551 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142812792516 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524969916375 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415218741012 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0913955974469 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298718511525 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.