It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important. Do you agree or disagree?
Wildlife conservation has always been a topic of fiery debate. It is argued that the government has been allocating more funds than necessary towards wildlife sanctuaries, ignoring other hot topics affecting their citizens like poverty and education. While acknowledging the fact that authorities should set aside funds to address such issues, I totally dismiss the notion that such expenses should be covered from money that has been earmarked for conserving our forests and its inhabitants.
Lack of nutritious food and access to education are two of the common issues that have plagued our society. The authorities typically run short of enough money to ensure that these basic needs of the society are met adequately. Moreover, they usually don’t have access to excess funds from other departments like the forestry department. Studies have shown that many poor countries in Africa have exorbitant money allocated towards the preservation of wild animals while its citizens suffer from poverty. This has led people to question why there is a need to spend on safeguarding and breeding animals at the expense of suffering human beings.
Rapid growth of urban cities and rural towns have led to the dwindling area of natural habitats for wild animals. To facilitate their expansion and growth, there has been massive deforestation causing animals to be shut out of their natural habitat. This has led to the extinction of many species not able to adapt to their changing surrounding. Many species of birds and animals have already gone extinct in the last century and many varieties of tigers and birds are on the verge of extinction. Therefore, in order to preserve our animals, it is of paramount importance to invest in sanctuaries where the endangered species can survive and thrive.
To conclude, as responsible citizens of this generation, we have a duty to ensure that we prevent the extinction of animals on our watch and ensure their availability for future generations. Despite the many genuine concerns affecting citizens that the governments should look into and find solutions for, there is no doubt in my mind that there shouldn’t be any reduction in the monetary allocations geared at conserving our wildlife.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-01 | JK82 | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-09 | jessie_12345 | 84 | view |
| 2020-06-12 | Birjees Fatima | 78 | view |
- News stories on TV and in a newspaper are often accompanied by pictures Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words What is your opinion about this 67
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion 73
- Some people think that books are losing importance as a source of information and entertainment To what extent do you agree 56
- As computers translate quickly and accurately learning foreign languages is a waste of time To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times even on holidays Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, so, therefore, while, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24512534819 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79611076792 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565459610028 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9664776514 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.533333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0804121979076 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.026746233751 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0294014107055 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0487238435785 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384302783483 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.