The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003, and projections for 2050
The column chart illustrates the proportions of the population in the four countries named India, China, America, and Japan from 1950, 2002, and predicts these percentages in 2050.
Overall, while the figure for Indian in 1950 was the lowest, that in the rest was consistently the highest. In addition, throughout this period, the percentages of the Japanese population was the smallest.
As can be seen from the column chart, the majority of people in the world belonged to Chinese in 1950, at just over 23%, which was followed by India, at nearly 15%. The third one was the proportion of Americans (approximately 7%), which was around twice times as high as that of the population in Japan this year (just under 5%). Also, the percentage of Chinese people experienced a significant decline by about 3% from 1950 to 2002. Next came Indians, which made up nearly 17%. Consequently, there were only roughly 5% and 3% of the population in the USA and Japan respectively.
Regarding the future data, in 2050, the highest figure of people will go to India, at over 17% and the second-highest will be in China, which will be about 7% as low as India. Nevertheless, only under 3% of Japanese and 5% of Americans in 2050.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-03 | dinhthu05 | 92 | view |
| 2021-07-30 | jashan978 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | jashan978 | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-08 | gur1040894 | 66 | view |
| 2021-06-08 | gur1040894 | view |
- the graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world 89
- The internet is viewed as an excellent means of communication but some people suggest that it may not the best place to find information 84
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 67
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years 84
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, third, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79047619048 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78527061994 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7522066495 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.6 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192508180222 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077787450204 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062554918474 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129744321828 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701328363352 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.