33.The following charts illustrate the information about players of electronic games in South Korea in 2003
The three pie charts provide information about the age, gender of players and compare sales of different areas in electronic games in Korea in 2003.
Overall, while there were more male participants in electronic games compared to female players, the 18-35 age group took the highest proportion of players in 2003. Likewise, Korean costumers spent the largest amount of expenditure on action.
According to the gender graph, almost 72% of male players occupied in electronic games, and this figure was nearly 50% higher than the proportion of female players. Moreover, the vast majority of participants were from the 18-35 age group, accounting for 39%, followed by the under 18 group, at 38%. However, people aged more than 36 years old were less likely to take part in the games compared to the other 2 groups.
Referring the best-selling chart, action dominated the first place with 43%, followed by sports and race with 20% and 17% respectively. The other types such as role play and education were not popular, accounting for only 7%, and the least proportion was from other types.
- The picture below shows the plant of museum in 1998 and after some changes was made in 2008 The maps illustrate changes which took place in the floor layout of a museum during the period of 10 years which began in 1998 49
- Below tables are the use of water by four different countries 71
- 48 The following pie charts show the use of social media by men and women in Australia in 2011 and 2014 79
- Some parents give their children everything that their children ask for and accept what their children want to do Is this good for children What could be the consequences for these children 89
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that money is better spent on human population To what extends do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, likewise, moreover, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07777777778 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56245445608 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.2297540972 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223362744105 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944790192578 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122382277149 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162645993422 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136875553097 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.