Although environment concerns are raised by sccientists, people are not changing their lifestyle. What should be done to encourage people to save environment?
While environmental problems have emerged in recent years, the majority of people still keep their ways of life. In my opinion, there are two main rationales responsible for this phenomenon: the inconveniences caused by switching lifestyles, the lack of appropriate punishments on violating environment conservation. In this essay, I suggest green technologies and imposing strict policies as two of many measurements to address environmental issues.
Firstly, changing daily routines to cope with environmental conservation leads to many difficulties. To be more specific, nowadays, people depend heavily on amenities to work, such as television, papers, clothes, which demands natural resources and powers; therefore, sudden changes in daily routines could impact on their jobs and lives. Furthermore, the lack of alternative and environmentally-friendly material resources in manufacturing, which are usually more expensive in comparison with conventional ones, leaves people with no choice but to purchase conventional products. Secondly, many businesses have been working, while generating pollution to the environment without any restrictions, because of the shortages in policies to prohibit these actions. As a result, pollution has become more severe, which results in many negative effects. According to a science article in the Thai Ecology Journal, without the measurements suggested by authorities, many industrial areas are contaminated by the wastes coming from factories, which affects the health of residents.
To deal with these uprising issues, green energies and recycled materials come up as effective solutions. By investing in technologies, such as electric vehicles, biodegradable materials, governments could easily introduce these alternative ways of life to their citizens and encourage them to protect the environment. For instance, people can use paper instead of plastic bags, which are harmful to soil; therefore, the number of plastic wastes would reduce gradually. Besides, imposing strict policies and heavy fines might help governments to control and monitor the manufacturing processes of factories. By doing this, governments could force businesses to switch their production line to other less resource-demanding ones; and these manufactures causing pollution will be shut down before damages can be caused. For example, an iron company in Australia was shut down, because the production line deteriorated the river habitats in 2015.
In conclusion, green energies and appropriate policies could help to change people’s behaviors toward the environment and reduce the negative effects on the environment.
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries Fairtrade a category of products for which farmers from developing countries have been paid an officially agreed fair price 73
- Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike To what extent do you agree or disagree 91
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs for example working for a charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Nowadays films are no longer made by big companies only Digital technology enables everybody to produce films Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- In some countries students pay their college or university fees while in some others the government pay for them Do you think the advantages that government pays the money outweigh the disadvantages 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2270.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.97368421053 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34944903891 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597368421053 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 710.1 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5629249055 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.875 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6875 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150394910365 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457968592649 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467977684201 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105358528592 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349207471515 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.64 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.