There are more negative impacts than benefits of people using mobile devices. Do you agree?
Recently, the phenomenon of "There are more negative impacts than benefits of people using mobile devices" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that traditional devices might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that using mobile devices can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the technology standpoint, the benefits of using mobile devices can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that increasing the knowledge of individuals and using modern tools are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of handheld devices on people's life. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both constructing small-scale utensils and high-tech systems distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of physiology, without the slightest doubt, negative impacts of using mobile devices might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the lack of physical activities. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the absence of exercises can relate to the reality that the demerits of mobile devices can pertain to the laziness of people. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of using mobile devices were correlated positively with increasing physical activities, the local authorities would ultimately address the obesity of children. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of developing a good balance between mobile devices and other devices.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of using mobile devices for people far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-24 | Behnaz fallah | 88 | view |
| 2020-09-07 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors Choose which position you most ag 88
- Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization 88
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 89
- In education is to learn life values and ethics as important to learn practical skills for future development 77
- Some people see prisons as the place where criminals should be punished while some people think their primary function should be to teach them how to lead better lives What is your opinion about the main function of time spent in prison punishment or reha 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79180887372 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13997254759 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610921501706 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 379.143842365 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.857526045 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.272727273 104.977214359 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6363636364 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368561537618 0.242375264174 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131873159436 0.0925447433944 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104990222471 0.071462118173 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213539542878 0.151781067708 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0840645605081 0.0609392437508 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 12.6369458128 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.71 53.1260098522 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 10.9458128079 155% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.12 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.