As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that the user should cover the costs. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
While some people think the government should pay for money invested in developing road systems to deal with an increase in cars, others think car users should pay for this expense. Both sides of the argument will be analyzed, and then I will elaborate on my own opinion.
It is understandable that some believe that money investment should be paid by the Government due to some reasons. Firstly, the main role of the government is improving citizens’ standard of living. Therefore, they must be deserved a more efficient public service which is at least the basic needs including road infrastructure. Secondly, car buyers are charged a considerable amount of tax to own and drive a car on roads, and therefore it is unfair to lay the responsibility for road upgrade works on them. For example, people in Vietnam have to pay almost twice as much to own a car since the taxes and fees account for nearly 50% of car prices. Therefore, it is better to use these taxes for road infrastructure investment rather than forcing citizens to pay for it.
On the other hand, some believe that this money investment should be on car users due to one main underlying reason. Compared to bike and motorbike, cars take up more road space due to its larger size and weight. It is estimated that the number of cars in Thailand made up nearly 80% of total vehicles on roads. As a result, the need for road expansion and enhancement is mainly to facilitate a more comfortable journey for car users so car commuters should take responsibility for paying for that costs.
In conclusion, although the argument in favor of road infrastructure costs belonging to car users might be convincing to some extent, I think that the Government should be the one to take full responsibility for this.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-10 | Manideep Macherla | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | ozair | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | ozair | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-19 | xiao_alatus | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-01 | lehonganh1212 | 73 | view |
- Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion Discuss both view and give your opinion 89
- As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road systems Some people think the government should pay for this Others however think that the user should cover the costs Discuss both view and give your opinion 67
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people say that it is possible for a country to be both economically successful and have a clean environment Others disagree Discuss both view and give your opinion 84
- in some cities people are choosing cars instead of bicycles while in other cities riding bikes are replacing cars Why is this the case Which development do you think is better 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, at least, for example, i think, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80456026059 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85031735272 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517915309446 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7501727311 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.461538462 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465317454827 0.244688304435 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16158981766 0.084324248473 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131412493609 0.0667982634062 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.324957075016 0.151304729494 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0942477820795 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.