Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods while others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this day and age, the usage of packaging of products is always a topic of interest. While it is argued that the main factor contributing to deplete the amount of packaging of commodities are manufacturers and supermarkets while others believe that customers are the only ones to be obliged for this issue. Although manufacturers and outlets are in charge of the process of devising packaged goods, I lean towards the latter.
On the one hand, manufacturers and markets are directly related to goods-packaging procedure. In fact, to guarantee the products’ quality during delivery and storage as well as deter them from being exposed to detrimentally environmental factors such as moist or heat, companies tend to utilize plastic bags to pack these goods. Of course, there are colossal alternative options with environmental benefits, but using plastic is more lucrative and economical. Therefore, many people think they must cover the cost of recycling and collecting packaging materials, especially plastic. For example, numerous food agencies have decided eradicate completely the packaging of goods or eschew plastics in favor of eco-friendly package in terms of products-packaging to minimize the adverse impact on the environment.
On the other hand, the obligation to plummet the quantity of packaged commodities is also said to belong to customers. That is because they have a preference of buying goods that are thoroughly packaged owing to the belief that more packaging can protect products from contamination and give them a hygienic feeling. As a result, they are likely to abuse packaging even when it is really unnecessary. Evidently, many people use a massive capacity of plastic bags or other materials to package food, drink, leftover or wrap goods they purchase from supermarkets. The result of this is that the surroundings will be soon polluted with the non-biodegradable trash leading to an unhealthy life for individuals. Furthermore, people believe that customers can put pressure on companies to change their attitudes towards over-packaging of goods by boycotting their products.
In conclusion, though manufacturers and supermarkets assume responsibility for packaging goods, purchasers are more under obligation to decline the amount of these products.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | hien3112 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | duykhanh3204 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-22 | minh phương phạm hồng | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-22 | minh phương phạm hồng | 71 | view |
- he following diagram shows how rainwater is reused for domestic purposes 92
- Many people feel that urban environments are more unhealthy than they have ever been What do you think are the main causes of this problem What measures can be effective in tackling this problem 88
- The diagrams below show changes in Happy Valley Shopping Centre in 1982 and 2012 89
- The diagrams below show changes in Happy Valley Shopping Centre in 1982 and 2012 89
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, really, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, of course, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1939.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52421652422 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25801631909 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1485729419 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.266666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8666666667 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3255539099 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109101544355 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669807527265 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198447210507 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403920566479 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.