Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Before discussing this prompt, firstly I need to define what does "critical judgement" mean. In my opinion, "critical judgement" refers to the ability to see things in different ways and form creative solutions that may not be thought about in the first place. Based on this definition, I disagree with the prompt in that expert can only represent one perspective among various point of views. Also, due to the knowledge does renew quickly under the digital era with information exporture, experts' opinions may no longer serve the highest value when everyone is able to access the critical information and form the critical judgement respectively.
To begin with, it is common that lots of policies are formed after the discussion and evaluation of so-called "experts", but the results are performed poorly and receive numerous complaints from citizens. For example, when a park is about to build within the neighborhood, while the "experts" who design the park don't really live in the area and afterwards establish a park that doesn't serve to the needs of residents there. Under this scenario, a better way to deliver a park that is appreciated by the residents is to include the ideas or the critical judgements from people who know the local area much more than the experts. By involving the users who understand the needs and the preferences of the park, the experts' ideas can be further polished and achieve a better solution that combine the positive input from both the experts and the resident.
Additionaly, urgent problems under our modern society are prone to involve diverse fields which makes the experts, who are normally specialized in one field, is insufficient in dealing with complex problems. For example, when tackling the global warming issues, we need to consult people basically from every industries since the pollution is produced by almost all industries and residents. Considering this context, if only the experts' perspectives are included, it is difficult to imagine the built up of the tracing system of the release of CO2 can be achieved. The important building block of this kind of system comes from the creation of people who are familiar with IT systems, different industries and even the local communities. Therefore, it is pertinent to say that critical judgement from various fields collaboratively create the tracing system of CO2 instead of only the experts' ideas.
Finally, the tradional way to train an expert is to feed lots of knowledge and takes a long times to turn a person into an expert. However, when the knowledge itterates so fast, it is questionable that the traditional way to train the expert can catch up to the most updated and relevant knowledge that are critical to certain issues. In closing this gap, critical judgements from other people who are also familar with the issues can play important roles to contribute.
In conclusion, I do believe that experts can not play the critical role by themselves since the information is chaning eveyday. Therefore, the critical judgements from people who also engage in the issues are important to creat value as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-16 | Jeyodi123 | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Anil2044 | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | AtharvaKale | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-21 | HSNDEK | 83 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | avidwriter1771 | 50 | view |
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your posi 70
- Humans have long been fascinated by elephants the largest land animal in the modern world Social animals that live in herds elephants are native to both Africa and Asia Their large ears long trunk and long life span have made elephants one of the most cap 80
- Issue Many important discoveries or creations are accidental it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statemen 62
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement a 58
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...'experts' who design the park dont really live in the area and afterwards ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ea and afterwards establish a park that doesnt serve to the needs of residents there. ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, really, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion, to begin with, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2661.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 514.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17704280156 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76146701107 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96694903353 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509727626459 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 829.8 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.5651642764 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.833333333 118.986275619 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5555555556 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.72222222222 5.21951772744 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181328624174 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062069286822 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368826299587 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105457627455 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274630360971 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 100.480337079 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.