Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Thanks to technological advancement, human beings have found themselves in a pool of intriguing choices making them wandered creatures among a wide range of selections. Therefore, it seems that having too many choices tend to be unavoidable in today’s world and I will explain now.
First of all, by looking at our ancestors era, we find out that having a shelter to protect them from unpredictable weather conditions and also probable invasion of wild animals was one of their priorities to feel secure. Furthermore, it is also obvious that there was not considerable technology growth or even advertising ways to produce and also introduce products in a wide range. Therefore, people only tried to prepare their necessities rather than being wander among choosing different products.
By inventing wheels and then advanced machineries in order to extract primitive row materials from mines all over the world to make them usable substances, the standards of life changed, and then the technology growth let people choose their favorite items from various available products in the market. Furthermore, creating more opportunities for trades of commodities through the overland, sea or air routes, naming globalization changed the way of living broadly. Nowadays, the vast majority of products are transported among countries for using other people abroad instead of being utilized merely by the local people, and it increases options of their choice. For example, if they want to buy a house, they try to consider the quality of materials used, meaning whether being strong enough against earthquake and having an acceptable interior design based on the world standards or not. Also, all of these variants have appeared because of a competitive environment existing among competing companies to produce their products in ways that can help them to increase their benefit by selling their products. Besides, we can consider majority of products ranging from electronic gadgets, home appliances to private vehicles which injected to the market with different brands and qualities. Then, by using tricky ways such as endorsing them by famous people or offering incredible discounts, people are encouraged to own them.
To conclude, it seems to me that technology has helped human beings to have majority of options when deciding to buy their necessities, and it will soar in the future to add up people’s convenience.
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 73
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organization Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 84
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 78
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the inforamtion by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, if, look, so, then, therefore, for example, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2148.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3300248139 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8339793832 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610421836228 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.8325464142 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.2 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8666666667 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23102573194 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998708134217 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153113970482 0.0667982634062 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218586182004 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.29324140815 0.056905535591 515% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.