The chart below gives information about the age of women in Australia when they give birth to their first child in 1966, 1986 and 2006.
The provided bar graph depicts the percentage of first-time mothers at six different age groups in Australia in three respective years - 1966 1986 and 2006.
Generally, over the given period, women tend to give birth later in their lives with the percentages of the two youngest age categories fell while the percentages of the next three age group were seen upward trends.
In 1966, first-time mothers whose ages ranged between 20 and 24 started at the highest percentage of about 70%, which was nearly twice as much as that of those who were 19 and below. There were very few women gave birth to the first child in their age ranges of 30 - 34 (approximately 15%) and 35 to 39 (13%). A negligible 2% of women who are 40 and above had a decision of giving birth to the first child in that year. In two-decade time, There was a tremendous plummet in the percentages of first-time mothers of the first two age categories to 20% and 40% respectively. Set up a portion of those whose aged between 30 to 35 rocketed to nearly 60% and then surpassed both of the previous age groups. There was not any change in the percentage of women who are above 40 years old in 1986.
20 years later percentages of first time mother in the first 2H categories continued to fall and there was also a mild reduction by nearly 10% in the proportion of women of the third age group. All of the first three age ranges were outnumbered by that of the fourth age range in 2006 (slightly more than 50%). A slight rise of about 3% was seen in the percentage of women of 40 and over giving birth to the first child.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-15 | TLan168 | 67 | view |
| 2022-03-08 | annalabie | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-04 | Nguyễn Ngọc Diệp | view | |
| 2020-12-22 | viviannguyen | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-26 | The Lazy Tiger | 56 | view |
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honor kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- The table below gives information about the values of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 73
- Some people think that because some children find some subjects such as mathematics and philosophy difficult so they ought to be optional instead of compulsory To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... 35 to 39 13%. A negligible 2% of women who are 40 and above had a decision of giving b...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 195, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...ortion of women of the third age group. All of the first three age ranges were outnumbered...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 33.7804878049 175% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 293.0 196.424390244 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.41979522184 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47909038002 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491467576792 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 384.3 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6202105271 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.727272727 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6363636364 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54545454545 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328585383265 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146441262074 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701464063322 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2134113089 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409803301922 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.81 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.