If Voting is compulsory in democratic society, what conclusions can we draw about Nature of democracy?
Recently, the phenomenon of "the compulsory voting in democratic societies" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that the nature of democracy might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that compulsory voting can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the political standpoint, the compulsory voting in democratic countries can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that increasing the participation of people and developing political policies are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of voting in the power of governments. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both making crucial decisions and promoting the level of societies distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of science, without the slightest doubt, conclusions of the compulsory voting might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the nature of democracy. Moreover, fundamental aspects of voting can relate to the reality that the demerits of compulsory voting can pertain to the dictatorship in some nations. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of the lack of people's participation in voting process were correlated positively with introducing proper incentives, the local authorities would ultimately address giving voting rights to women. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of learning voting advantages by students.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of the compulsory voting in democratic societies far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-27 | mohammadsabet | 88 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | mohammadsabet | 88 | view |
| 2020-11-12 | Behnaz fallah | 85 | view |
| 2020-09-30 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | gupta-vikas | 62 | view |
- Nowadays people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life Discuss 88
- Some schools believe that children should learn typing rather than a good handwriting How far do you agree with that Show reasons with your experience 85
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Students can obtain information of academic subject from online the printed books and articles and discussion with their teachers and their peers Which one is the most reliable source 85
- University tuition fees are increasing Some argue that higher education should be made free To what extend do you agree 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 720, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to vote'.
Suggestion: to vote
...fer the preconceived notion of learning voting advantages by students. To conclude,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87931034483 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32287320339 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603448275862 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 379.143842365 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.9229059476 50.4703680194 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.0 104.977214359 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329243787169 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115301299235 0.0925447433944 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554392043228 0.071462118173 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18644027175 0.151781067708 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278752685453 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 12.6369458128 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.71 53.1260098522 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 10.9458128079 155% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.97 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.