Experience is the best teacher. Some people believe it is more effective than formal school study and books, what do you think?
Recently, the phenomenon of "experience is the best teacher; some people believe it is more effective than formal school study and books" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that formal education might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that formal school study and books can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, learning from experiences can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that being a skilled worker and experience as the best teacher are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the relationship between experiences and books. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both gaining knowledge and increasing the awareness of people distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of education science, without the slightest doubt, the lack of formal school study and books might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the inefficiency of students. Moreover, fundamental aspects of formal education can relate to the reality that the demerits of theoretical studies can pertain to the lack of practical experiments. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of formal school study were correlated positively with experiences, the local authorities would ultimately address increasing the quality of universities. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of the traditional and online books.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of formal school study and books far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-19 | sadeghian_zhr@yahoo.com | 80 | view |
| 2020-12-19 | sadeghian_zhr@yahoo.com | 88 | view |
| 2020-12-19 | sadeghian_zhr@yahoo.com | 88 | view |
| 2020-10-07 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-07-04 | Gohar Khan | 70 | view |
- the three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that younger employees often have more skills knowledge and motivation than the old employees To what extent do you agree with it Use your experience 85
- Do you think that young people should be restricted on certain things that they can do such as driving or smoking until they reach the age of 25 What are your views on this 49
- Some people see prisons as the place where criminals should be punished while some people think their primary function should be to teach them how to lead better lives What is your opinion about the main function of time spent in prison punishment or reha 80
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74829931973 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22745923721 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.0408097919 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.636363636 104.977214359 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7272727273 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349867967541 0.242375264174 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118306147447 0.0925447433944 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11768893758 0.071462118173 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192857116646 0.151781067708 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113919319514 0.0609392437508 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.