The table gives information about the share of market for mobile phones in the years 2005-2006 showing the data in percentages.
It is possible to notice that the primacy was reached by Nokia in 2005 with an amount of 32.5 that increased of a percentage of 2.5 in the following year; there are moreover other two examples of rise given by Motorola and Sony Ericsson.
The first one in fact passed from 17.7 to 21.1 % while the second brand of phone, even if the numbers regarding the share of the market are smaller, improved from 6.3 to 7.4%.
For what concerns instead Samsung, LG, BenQ Mobile and other mobile phones they all registered a fall: the most significant drop is represented by Other brands that started in 2005 with 19.2% and finished in the next year with 16.2% followed by Samsung( from 12.7 to 11.8) LG in which however the amount of sharing differed just a bit from 2005 and finally BenQ mobile with 4.9% in 2005 and 2.4 in 2006.
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 93
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, It is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.Discuss both these views 67
- Directors of large companies often receive much bigger salary increases than ordinary workers Employers organizations say that in global market this is necessary to attract the best management talent What are your views 68
- Some people argue that it is more important to have an enjoyable job than to earn a lot of money. Others disagree and think that a good salary leads to a better life. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 60
- The table below gives information about student enrolments at Bristol University in 1928 1958 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 48
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 42.75 21.0
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 4 10
No. of Words: 171 200
No. of Characters: 757 1000
No. of Different Words: 107 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.616 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.427 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.255 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 46 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 32 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 20 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 10 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 42.75 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 19.266 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.532 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 1 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.027 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4