The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.
The author infers that greatness of nations are evaluated by the general welfare of its citizens not by the achievements of its rulers, artists or scientists. Some people claim that country's greatness can be calculated by high performance of its rulers, artists or scientists and present countries which are regarded as great country due to its many Nobel-Prize winner. However I agree to the authors for several reasons.
First, I admit that people usually regard nation as great nation if their artists and scientists perform well. For example, the nation where produced the most scientists who won Nobel-Prize is United States and it is followed by England and Germany. As we all know, these three countries are all regarded as great nations. What is more, many countries in Europe had contained tremendous artists and they are also regarded as great country.
However, greatness of scientists, rulers and artists is not always corresponded to country's greatness. For example, let us consider Africa. Historically, Africa's artists had performed superiorly. There are many well-known artists who lived in Africa: Tracey Rose, Meschac Gaba, etc. However they are not treated as great nation. What is more, India, where ranked 3rd in abundance of scientific human resource and had so many patents in science, is not regarded as great country just because it has well-developed science. Likewise countries can not be evaluated as great country if their people had low general welfare even though they performed well in science and art.
Finally, countries are existing for their people. Therefore it is surely that general welfare of nation's people is indicator of a great nation. United States is regarded as the best nation in the world not because their rulers, artists or scientists performed well. Having a lot of money is also not the reason. For example, Saudi Arabia where contains a lot of oil and haves tremendous amount of money does not treated as great because its people have low-level of welfare. South-Korea, where lacks natural resources and produces none of Nobel-Prize winner in science fields, has high level of general welfare and people treat it as great country.
Examples of countries where are considered as great nation and not have been presented to state that the greatness can not be explained by high performances of rulers, artists, or scientists but by the general welfare of its people. As I mentioned above, countries are existing for their citizens and therefore it is natural that level of welfare is the surest indicator of greatness. In conclusion, I agree with the author's view.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-01 | student193044 | 50 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | wendyz2396 | 66 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | wendyz2396 | 66 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | wendyz2396 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | Jhon Kwame | 50 | view |
- Recently butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States This change however has had little impact on our customers In fact only about 2 percent of customers have complained indicating tha 68
- Claim The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models Reason Heroes and role models reveal a society s highest ideals 54
- According to an independent poll of 200 charitable organizations overall donations of money to nonprofit groups increased last year but educational institutions did not fare as well as other organizations Donations to international aid groups increased th 53
- Most homes in the northeastern United States where winters are typically cold have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating Last heating season that region experienced 90 days with below normal temperatures and climate forecasters predict th 60
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter the college 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...try due to its many Nobel-Prize winner. However I agree to the authors for several reas...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'correspond'
Suggestion: correspond
...sts, rulers and artists does not always corresponded to countrys greatness. For example, let...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 457, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'regard'
Suggestion: regard
...ad so many patents in science, does not regarded as great country just because it had de...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 531, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
...ause it had developed its science well. Likewise countries can not be evaluated as great...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 24, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...ence and art. Finally, countries are exist for their people. Therefore it is surel...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
..., countries are exist for their people. Therefore it is surely that general welfare of na...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 410, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'treat'
Suggestion: treat
...ves tremendous amount of money does not treated as great because its people have low-le...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, likewise, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2205.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 428.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15186915888 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65605910503 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427570093458 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 675.0 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.6759738402 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8695652174 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6086956522 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82608695652 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399567448234 0.243740707755 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121716819024 0.0831039109588 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119921439175 0.0758088955206 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264815639042 0.150359130593 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767142912347 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.