The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Every society has its own pre-established laws, norms and biases which have been passed down from centuries. These practices have been influenced from learnings in the past that were too important to not to be passed down to future generations. These practices, however, should be upgraded as the world surrounding up changes. Changing these practices or thought processes which have been given to us by society is essential or else our society would be orthodox. These innate constraints of society can only be upgraded if we keep questioning it. In this essay, I will provide two main reasons with contextual examples how questioning the society is important.
Swami Vivekananda, the great sage of India who shed new light on Hinduism in 1864 at the Conference of Religions of Chicago, did not even accept the spiritual practices of his own master Shri Ramakrishnan when he began his journey. He even dared to mock and naively questioned Shri Ramakrishnan about the divinity of his Gods. It is solely because of this naivety of Swami Vivekananda he was able to devote his life to the spread the knowledge of the Vedas and keep the mission of his master alive. My point is that questioning the authority of the society helps us believe in it more. If we find rationality and logic behind the practices or biases of any society, we are sure to accept it.
Before the influence of the British, Indians used to practice sati, the live burning of a widow on her late husband’s cremation. I cannot imagine why these practices came into being in the first place, but when the cruel British took over even, they were shocked to see people practice sati. Back then, no one dare question the practices of the society; and those who did so, were banned from the society. Hence, until and unless we question the practices and the authority of the society, we will not be able to abolish the wrong things in it.
I would conclude by saying that no society is perfect. But it is only the act of questioning that will ever bring society next to perfection.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-05 | titanite09 | 54 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | raghavchauhan619 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | priyanshu1 | 75 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | priyanshu1 | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | SamikshaVarpe | 58 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, so, then, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77808988764 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64506380213 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561797752809 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7867269271 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.058823529 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9411764706 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52941176471 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253597306308 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851081264126 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634417684181 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14599604752 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369668398492 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.