The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each categories from five organisations.
The column chart compares the proportion of money that five organizations invested in four catalogs: machinery, building, staff training and research, measured in billion euros.
Overall, while the organization A, D and E spent more money on building facilities than other categories, staff training was invested the most in organization B and organization C tended to use more money on two other areas.
The amount of money using for training the staff in organization B outnumbered other areas and companies, at around 1.9 billion euros. Furthermore, this organization funded for research categories higher than other organizations, stood at 1.6, 0.3 billion euros higher than the second ranking, organization C, at roughly 1.3.
In building area, organization A invested the most money compared to other companies, at approximate 1.5. Whereas in company C, there was the same amount of money using for machinery and research, which were spent more than other categories; in particular, the quantity of money for machines was significantly higher than other organizations.
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at Queen mary hospital since its construction in 1969 73
- Education levels by age rage 2010 78
- Task 2 Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis Wha are the reasons and what can be done to encourage them to spend their time walking 67
- Task 1 Line Graph The Graph Below Shows The Number Of Enquiries Received By The Tourist Information Office In One City Over A Six Month Period In 2011 73
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...taff training and research, measured in billion euros. Overall, while the organization...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, second, whereas, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 32.9175257732 6% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 26.3917525773 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.85567010309 207% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 937.175257732 98% => OK
No of words: 165.0 206.0 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54545454545 4.54256449028 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.78020617076 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16155742676 2.54303337028 124% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 127.690721649 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539393939394 0.622605031667 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 290.88556701 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 12.6804123711 32% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 16.3608247423 251% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 157.26311551 44.8134815571 351% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 228.75 76.5299724578 299% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 41.25 16.8248392259 245% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 13.5 4.34317383033 311% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 7.41237113402 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136012101593 0.216113520407 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102145126923 0.0766984524023 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335274841451 0.0603063233224 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102017689243 0.12726935374 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373617689538 0.0580467560999 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.3 8.37731958763 302% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 21.4 70.7449484536 30% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 3.82989690722 415% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.5 7.45979381443 275% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.8 8.71597938144 181% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 7.59969072165 126% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 41.2886597938 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 8.62886597938 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 8.54432989691 215% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 16.0 8.15463917526 196% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...taff training and research, measured in billion euros. Overall, while the organization...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, second, whereas, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 32.9175257732 6% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 26.3917525773 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.85567010309 207% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 937.175257732 98% => OK
No of words: 165.0 206.0 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54545454545 4.54256449028 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.78020617076 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16155742676 2.54303337028 124% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 127.690721649 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539393939394 0.622605031667 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 290.88556701 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 12.6804123711 32% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 16.3608247423 251% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 157.26311551 44.8134815571 351% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 228.75 76.5299724578 299% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 41.25 16.8248392259 245% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 13.5 4.34317383033 311% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 7.41237113402 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136012101593 0.216113520407 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102145126923 0.0766984524023 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335274841451 0.0603063233224 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102017689243 0.12726935374 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373617689538 0.0580467560999 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.3 8.37731958763 302% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 21.4 70.7449484536 30% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 3.82989690722 415% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.5 7.45979381443 275% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.8 8.71597938144 181% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 7.59969072165 126% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 41.2886597938 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 8.62886597938 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 8.54432989691 215% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 16.0 8.15463917526 196% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.