Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The author is claiming one can understand the characteristics of a society by taking look at its men or women who are treated as heroes or role models as they represent the highest ideals of the society. However, there are many reasons that people shouldn’t examine a society by only targeting at its heroes.
The heroes may not represent the society as they only play a role as a savior, who did something which are beneficial to the society or its people, and they do not hold the “highest value” of the society. Fireman, who saves citizens’ life, can be entitled as hero, but their characteristics vary a lot, and thus could not represent the society. If we examine their character, we will only understand their personality instead of the society’s character.
There are many features in a society that cannot be represented by people. If we want to study culture, it’s necessary for us to either read the literature or study the history and tradition; all of which are incorporated in physical substances such as books, drawings, and buildings. People can hardly learn culture from a person’s character, so we’d better not to learn a society by examining its heroes or role models.
Finally, besides some of role models, there are other wise people who can also represent the highest value of the society. It’s necessary to examine all of these people when studying a society. People who have brilliant achievement in different area may also hold the highest value. For example, an expert in anthropology, who conduct studies related to the hierarchy of a country, may have the characteristic of being respectful as he understands that different treatments toward people of different races would influence their life. In this case, we need to study the expert’s character, and thus we know that there are racial discrimination issues exist in the society, which is also a character of the society.
For the above three reasons, people should know that examining heroes or role models can help study some parts of a society’s character, but we also need to take a look at other people who achieve in different areas, and other none-person features that could represent the society to have an all-around understanding of the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | Zahid6400 | 66 | view |
| 2024-01-26 | LauraTing | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Isolus | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 83 | view |
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 50
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements with that field 62
- The following appeared as part of a promotional campaign to sell advertising space in the Daily Gazette to grocery stores in the Marston area Advertising the reduced price of selected grocery items in the Daily Gazette will help you increase your sales Co
- Claim We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own Reason Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning 54
- Claim Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive Reason It is primarily in cities that a nation s cultural traditions are preserved and generated Write a response in which you discuss the ext 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, however, if, look, may, so, thus, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1888.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 377.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00795755968 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88178677743 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458885941645 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 601.2 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.5538856749 60.3974514979 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.857142857 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9285714286 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284805729582 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113818869235 0.0831039109588 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107441556371 0.0758088955206 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204506990663 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115651116151 0.0667264976115 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.