The charts below show the number of French adults whose parents spoke a French regional language to them when they were children and the number who speak a French regional languange to their own children
The chart shows that Occitan language was the most spoken language both habitually and occasionally in the past. 600 of the parents of the adults spoke Occitan habitually and 1.1m spoke to them occasionally. But now approximately 250 of the adults speak Occitan to their children. According to this information, adults who speak Occitan language to their children have decreased.
Alsatian language is now spoken the most by adults to their children. Now 400 adults speak Alsatian to their children. However, in the past, approximately 300 of the parents of the adults spoke this language to them occasionally. Which is proof of an increase in adults who speak Alsatian language occasionally to their children. Yet 600 adults spoke Alsatian to their children habitually in the past.
Corsican was the least spoken language by adults to their children in the past. Also, it is now spoken the least. The Corsican language was spoken by 200 parents occasionally and approximately by 180 parents habitually. It is now spoken by 50 parents. The numbers of parents who spoke this language to their children have dropped even though there has not been much decrease. Creole is the other language that has fallen but not as much as other languages. Breton was spoken by 300 parents habitually and by 400 parents occasionally, but now it is spoken by under 100 parents.
In conclusion, all of the languages have decreased even though there were no big differences in some of them, except the Alsatian language where there was an increase in numbers of parents who spoke the language to their children occasionally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-20 | 81206Ecema | 69 | view |
| 2020-02-20 | mohamed3bed | 93 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | martin123 | 64 | view |
| 2019-03-07 | atikahadoria | 71 | view |
| 2019-03-06 | Indri Eka Putri | 77 | view |
- THE GRAPH SHOWS THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATES IN THE US AND JAPAN BETWEEN MARCH 1993 AND MARCH 1999 78
- The charts below show the number of French adults whose parents spoke a French regional language to them when they were children and the number who speak a French regional languange to their own children 69
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status 73
- Happiness is considered very important in life Why is it difficult to define What factors are important in achieving happiness 61
- Without capital punishment the death penalty our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...oke this language to them occasionally. Which is proof of an increase in adults who s...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...y under 100 parents. In conclusion, all of the languages have decreased even though th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 5.60731707317 357% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 266.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07894736842 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81564893192 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.342105263158 0.547539520022 62% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 403.2 283.868780488 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.1872973445 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.4705882353 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6470588235 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.41176470588 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.09268292683 342% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308213569106 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134461649906 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076515184169 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230427045273 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04161728065 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.22 8.06136585366 77% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.