Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.
Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
Recently, the phenomenon of "some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools, but others think it exploits children " and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that advertisements might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the additional funding can be plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the economics standpoint, placing advertisements in schools can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that raising funds and public schools are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of additional funding. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both the presence of more budgets and increasing the quality of education distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, the effects of placing advertisements in schools might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of being a captive audience. Moreover, fundamental aspects of corporate sponsors can relate to the reality that the demerits of exploiting childen can pertain to the lack of funding. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of advertising in schools were correlated positively with the children's self-esteem, the local authorities would ultimately address the federal budget for public schools. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of finding new resources for schools.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of placing advertisements in schools far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-25 | sattar_iust | 85 | view |
| 2020-09-19 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2017-08-08 | aditya_agarwal | 69 | view |
- the maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs for example working for a charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Television serves many functions Watching TV makes us relax We can learn knowledge and information from TV programs Besides TV can also be seen as a companion To what extent do you agree with this 77
- Technology allows us to have a helpful and interesting life than in the past Do you agree or disagree 88
- Marketing in companies should be based on reputation or short term strategies 85
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aspects of corporate sponsors can relate to the reality that the demerits of expl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80689655172 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28042513413 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627586206897 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.2854408742 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.090909091 104.977214359 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342311364925 0.242375264174 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104316892546 0.0925447433944 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921538770187 0.071462118173 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180148679384 0.151781067708 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823695454122 0.0609392437508 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 12.6369458128 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.02 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aspects of corporate sponsors can relate to the reality that the demerits of expl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80689655172 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28042513413 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627586206897 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.2854408742 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.090909091 104.977214359 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342311364925 0.242375264174 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104316892546 0.0925447433944 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921538770187 0.071462118173 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180148679384 0.151781067708 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823695454122 0.0609392437508 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 12.6369458128 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.02 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.