Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?
It is undeniable that Art forms of any kind are an essential part of our lives. By this virtue, how the government supports arts is always a topic of interest. Some people say that the government’s subsidy on art is redundant and that there are more serious problems which need addressing. I do not agree with this view and my reasons are stated below.
First and foremost, Financing art preservation is an effective way to perverse and promote culture because Arts which comprises of literature, sculptor, paintings, etc. represent a nation’s Identity and cultural heritage. The money allocated from the state budget can be used to protect forms of art. This, therefore, encourages people to learn more about their country’s history and cultural values and increase their patriotism and pride in their nation. For example, by preserving
Another reason to support government funding on arts is that investing in arts also gives a boost to a nation’s economy, especially, tourism. One of the main purposes of the majority of tourists is to discover and experience the culture and lifestyle of local people. They would learn these from art forms. For instance, many people flock to Paris every year to see ancient architectural monuments that have lasted for hundred years. They have to pay for accommodation and other expenses and this would improve the local economy and contribute to the government’s budget which can be allocated to other necessary fields.
Last but not least, the Art industry provides ample employment opportunities. To illustrate, in countries like Britain and France where arts are highly sponsored by the states, there has been a high demand for not just curators, artists, musicians but also writers and authors to fill up the posts in these countries. Without the government’s expenditure on arts to maintain museums or other art institutes, these professions would have no way to make a living, contributing to an increase in the unemployment rate.
In conclusion, It is important for the government to provide financial support to the arts because this will not only preserve a country’s culture but also generate great income.
- Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourism industries Why is this the case Is it a positive development 78
- Topic as well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 84
- Some people argue that parents should choose what major should be focused to study at university for their children while others say students should have they own freedom to make a choice Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is undeniable that Art forms of any k...
^^
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
... and promote culture because Arts which comprises of literature, sculptor, paintings, etc. r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 484, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their nation. For example, by preserving Another reason to support government fun...
^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...tectural monuments that have lasted for hundred years. They have to pay for accommodati...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1826.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20227920228 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9227464645 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575498575499 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3257552461 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.411764706 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6470588235 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52941176471 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225330763849 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739912490842 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630948211839 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131109889613 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713863137659 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.