People say that it is a waste of time for highschool students to learn literature such as novels and poems. Do you agree or disagree?
There has been a hot debate among educators about the necessity of teaching students at high school ancient literature. As they are on the path of going to work or higher education, I personally believe that highschoolers should only learn novels and poems from the past if they are really motivated to follow the field related to literature in the future.
On the one hand, literature education is necessary for students who are interested in learning poems. For one reason, these are the only group who can really study novelty or poetry well thanks to their motivation and commitment to the subject which many often feel bored about and uncomfortable with. For another, they are vital potential labour sources for many fields in which understanding literature is among necessary skills like literature education, anthropology or archaeology. Many countries around the world, especially developing ones like Vietnam, do not have enough people working in these fields because of their unattractiveness financially; hence they need to keep and invest in as many students interested in literature as possible.
On the other hand, for the majority of students who are going to the field irrelevant to literature from the past, learning this subject is certainly the waste of time. In contemporary society, other subjects like maths and languages are certainly crucial since they could be be applied in almost all of occupations, making a large number of students to learn hard to be as successful as possible in school and for their future. Spending nearly all of their time and efforts gaining math and language skills, these students tend to ignore all other subjects, including literature, in which there are no vital skills to learn. As they have no interest nor practical reasons to learn poetry or novelty, it would be unrealistic and even troublesome to require these learners to at least pay attention the literature subject itself.
In conclusion, I do not totally agree that all students do not need to learn literature. Educators should encourage only those who are keen on the subject should be to follow their literature path, and not let it be the hindrance from pursuing future work or higher education in other fields.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-26 | trieu23012021 | 89 | view |
| 2021-05-28 | hang9815 | 61 | view |
| 2021-01-26 | trieu23012021 | 89 | view |
| 2021-01-26 | trieu23012021 | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | lamvybbi | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...around the world, especially developing ones like Vietnam, do not have enough people...
^^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: be
... are certainly crucial since they could be be applied in almost all of occupations, m...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ed in almost all of occupations, making a large number of students to learn hard to be as success...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, really, so, well, at least, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1878.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13114754098 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80847737468 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502732240437 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.9254545321 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.5 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250242021837 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105584740095 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696383645103 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147883500672 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129082493728 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.