Some people say that advertisement targeting children may have negative effects on them and suggest banning such advertisement as a solution To what extent do you agree or disagree
During formative years each and every happening has a great impact on children's life. Some individuals argue commercials specifically designed for the younger generation have a bad influence on their minds, and a possible solution is banning such ads. Such kind of advertisements has a greater effect on their health and habits. In this essay, we are going to discuss the harmful effects which it had on children.
Although, a diverse variety of products sold by different brands by particularly keeping in mind their customers at young ages which directly have a bad influence on their health. For example, fast food brands advertise their products at school. This kind of food is tasty but contains a large amount of cholesterol causing fats and synthetic material which causing obesity in European countries. Many people developing heart-related diseases at a younger age than before.
Another factor is an unhealthy eating habit and expensive food instead of using organic food they demand restaurant meals may be because they did not develop taste. Such food items are expensive also and it's impossible to eat daily. Children have a raw mind and they use them because at a younger age they are unable to distinguish between what is good and beneficial for them. If someone did not utilize organic food for a longer period of time body would become unreceptive to it. Its become their lifestyle for the rest of life because they could not digest healthy ones.
Advertisement banning is an effective technique because the first encounter of most people to anything occurs by ads. School and Government also pay special attention to regulating which being on air on tv or other media.
In conclusion, to market, any product basic and most influential source is an advertisement that particular target specific type of customers. According to some people's point of view ads which design for underage children should be strictly regularized or banned by authorities. I strongly, agree with this side of the argument because it's not only affecting directly indirectly in many ways.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-11-20 | kayra | 73 | view |
2020-11-11 | Farwa Nasir | 95 | view |
2015-05-17 | uponthesky | 59 | view |
- People who read for pleasure have better imagination and language skills than those who prefer watching TV To what extend do you agree or disagree 89
- The line graph below gives the information about the number of visitor to three London museums between Jun and September 2013 Summarize the information by reporting and selecting main features and make comparison where possible 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the change in each category of export in 2016 compared to 2015 Summarise the information and make a comparison where possible 67
- the map shows the changes in Pentland from 1980 to 2008 Summarise the information and make comparisons where possible 61
- Some people tend to play computer game rather than do sports Why is this What can be done tackle to problem 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...d not utilize organic food for a longer period of time body would become unreceptive to it. It...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, for example, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13823529412 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78069687066 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617647058824 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6060838885 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0555555556 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200473106977 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614117288501 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565136020902 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115378402471 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564970237499 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.