The line graph illustrates the proportion of tourists visiting an island in the Caribbeans from 2010 to 2017.
Overall, the total number of tourists increased dramatically during the period. Also, the number of people staying on cruise ships increased, overtaking the number of visitors staying on the island.
Firstly, in 2010, visitors residing on the island was around 0.75 million, whereas, the proportion of people staying on cruise ships were below 0.5 million. From 2010 onwards number of visitors staying on the island increased dramatically, and in 2013, it stood at 1.5 million, between 2013 to 2017 the number of people staying on the island were relatively similar(1.5 million). However, the figures for cruise ships increased rapidly, surpassing the former midway through 2015 and reaching the peak in 2017 of 2 million.
The total number of visitors also increased during the period. The figures started at 1 million visitors in 2010, rose rapidly over the years and by 2015 it was around 2.7 million, the numbers remained similar until 2016, however; by 2017 it rose dramatically to 3.5 million visitors, respectively.
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries in three different years over a twenty year period
- Children can learn effectively from watching television which is why it should be encouraged at school and at home To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- School teachers are more responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- The graph shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The Graph below shows water levels in reservoirs in Australia 64
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30386740331 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67046929307 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491712707182 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0246445487 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187272520051 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101532541518 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762356888817 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149153732984 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796536424739 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.